Legal Opinion

New England Merchants National Bank v. Converse

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 16, 1977Published

1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.

Guardians ad litem are here objecting to trustees’ accounts because no adjustment was made between income and principal to reimburse principal for a portion of Federal capital gains taxes paid out of principal. Pursuant to Federal law certain capital expenses were deducted in determining the net income taxable to the income beneficiaries; if those expenses had been available as deductions in determining the capital gains taxes, lesser taxes would have been paid out of principal. We hold that in the circumstances of these cases the trustees are not required to make the adjustment in question.

In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of Herbert R. Penney, Deceased. Milton H. Penney v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. Holcombe v. GinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of DickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  4. In re the Estate of HollowayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  5. In re the Estate of LecompteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API