Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Holloway

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 14, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

This is a motion by the guardian ad litem to reargue the decision (reported in 67 Mise 2d 132) that the trustees were not required to charge income with income taxes payable by four residuary trusts as the result of principal distributions to those trusts. Those distributions were “ deemed ” income under the 1954 Internal Revenue Code policy decision to treat all distributions, whether of corpus or income, as taxable income to the recipients to the extent of the estate’s distributable net income (Internal Revenue Code, §§ 661, 662).

The complexion of this matter has altered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. In re the Estate of DickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  3. In re the Estate of KingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  4. In re the Estate of LecompteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
  5. In re Kent's EstatePalm Beach County Judge's Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hill v. Estate of RichardsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. In re the Estate of CoeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  3. In re the Estate of JacobsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1994
  4. In re the Estate of ProssNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
  5. In re the Estate of BackusNew York Surrogate's Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API