Voight v. Counties of Big Stone
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This case arose from the termination of appellant’s employment as a district court reporter for the judicial district encompassing respondent counties. Appellant sued the counties, claiming his termination violated the Minnesota Veterans Preference Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court ruled that appellant was not an employee of respondent counties and dismissed his complaint. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Jerome F. Voight, Sr., is a 58-year-old male veteran. From 1971 to 1983 he was employed as an official court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Home Mutual Insurance Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Kuehn v. State, Department of Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Paske v. County of DakotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davila v. Ramsey County Community Human Services DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Schleck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Davila v. Ramsey County Community Human Services DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985