Legal Opinion
Geoffrey Honneus v. George Donovan
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 20, 1982No. 82-1135PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
Pro se defendant-appellant George Donovan, a member of the Massachusetts bar, appeals from a district court order, 93 F.R.D. 433, denying his F.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. Donovan filed the motion one day less than a year after the district court entered an order that a default judgment be entered against him.
Geoffrey Honneus, pro se plaintiff-appellee brought suit against Donovan, who was at that time his brother-in-law, and three other members of the Massachusetts bar. The complaint, filed in December 1976, alleged that Honneus was a citizen of Florida, who was at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- McCormick v. SullivantSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Samuel J. Jordon v. John J. GilliganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Mallory v. EyrichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Combs v. Nick Garin TruckingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Practical Concepts, Inc. v. Republic of BoliviaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Casio, Inc. v. S.M. & R. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Fafel v. DiPaolaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.