Fafel v. DiPaola
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Leonard Fafel appeals from the denial of his Rule 60(b)(4) motion for relief from an injunction that prohibits him from pursuing claims in state court in contravention of a consent judgment entered in federal court pursuant to Rule 68. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 (Relief from Judgment or Order); Fed.R.Civ.P. 68 (Offer of Judgment). Fafel argues that the injunction is void for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the district court misunderstood the scope of its ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the underlying Rule 68 judgment. Given that the district…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Johnson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Baella-Silva v. HulseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Jefferson County Commission v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- United States v. Rodriguez-RosadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.