Legal Opinion

Fafel v. DiPaola

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 7, 2005No. 04-1718PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Leonard Fafel appeals from the denial of his Rule 60(b)(4) motion for relief from an injunction that prohibits him from pursuing claims in state court in contravention of a consent judgment entered in federal court pursuant to Rule 68. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 (Relief from Judgment or Order); Fed.R.Civ.P. 68 (Offer of Judgment). Fafel argues that the injunction is void for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the district court misunderstood the scope of its ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the underlying Rule 68 judgment. Given that the district…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. Baella-Silva v. HulseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. Jefferson County Commission v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. United States v. Rodriguez-RosadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API