Legal Opinion

Garrison v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 13, 2024No. S24G0007PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

319 Ga. 711

FINAL COPY S24G0007. GARRISON v. THE STATE. PETERSON, Presiding Justice. Georgia case law makes clear that the State generally must allege and prove that a prosecution is brought within the applicable statute of limitations. Although this requirement is most often satisfied by alleging and proving the date that the crime was committed, sometimes more is required. One line of precedent holds that in prosecutions where the State seeks to toll the applicable limitations period under statutes permitting such tolling in specific factual situations, the State must also allege and prove…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Musacchio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. United States v. SissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
  2. McIver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
  3. Andrew James Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024
  4. Chapple v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2026
  5. Javier Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API