Legal Opinion
Williams v. Wohlgemuth
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 22, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-3162PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BRODERICK, District Judge.
In this action the plaintiffs challenge the validity of § 6170, Appendix III of the Regulations of the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare 1 which provides emergency assistance payments to needy recipients for special needs resulting only from civil disorders or natural disasters. The plaintiffs contend that § 6170, Appendix III violates the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 603(a)(5) and 606(e) and federal regulation 45 C. F.R. § 233.120. The plaintiffs also contend that § 6170, Appendix III is violative of due process and equal…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bacon v. ToiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Bardo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- White v. BealDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Alexander v. PolkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Gonzalez v. YoungDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.