Legal Opinion

State v. Stanfield

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1987No. 16291PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

We are asked to decide whether a district judge should have reduced an indeterminate seven-year sentence imposed for lewd conduct. The question is presented by David Stanfield, who stands convicted upon his plea of guilty to a charge of lewd conduct with his seven-year-old daughter. After the time to appeal the judgment had elapsed, but within the time allowed by I.C.R. 35, Stanfield filed a motion seeking reduction of his sentence. He requested that the sentence be changed to probation so he could be released from prison and could participate in a community-based mental health…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. ArambulaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. FreemanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. PettitIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. LavyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SeiberIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Humphrey v. Whole Foods Market Rocky Mountain/Southwest, L.P.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. LeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State v. GarciaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API