Legal Opinion

State v. Dahms

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Stark County; W. C. Crawford, J. From a judgment of conviction of the crime of keeping and maintaining a common nuisance, defendant appeals. Where the statutes distinctly limit the punishment to persons who participate in the act only in a certain way, they furnish the rule for the court. 1 Bishop, New Crim.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Stark County; W. C. Crawford, J. From a judgment of conviction of the crime of keeping and maintaining a common nuisance, defendant appeals. Where the statutes distinctly limit the punishment to persons who participate in the act only in a certain way, they furnish the rule for the court. 1 Bishop, New Crim. Law, § 657, subdiv. 2. A person who by acts induces a crime is not punishable unless the statute upon such crime makes him so: Anderson v. South Chicago Brewing Co. 173 Ill. 213, 50 N. E. 655; Bishop, Crim. Law, § 657; State v. Cullins, 53 Kan. 100, 24 L.E.A.…

1Opinion of the CourtFiSK, J.

Appellant was convicted in tbe lower court of tbe crime of keeping and maintaining a liquor nuisance, and was sentenced to imprisonment in tbe county jail for ninety days, and to pay a fine, including costs, of $600. He has appealed from tbe judgment. Prior to tbe pronouncement of judgment, defendant moved, both in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, upon numerous grounds, among which are alleged insufficiency of tbe evidence to warrant tbe verdict, and alleged erroneous instructions to tbe jury prejudicial to tbe defendant. These are tbe only grounds which we need notice.

It is conceded…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. RozumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Commonwealth v. ChurchillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. State v. EkangerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bent v. Erie Telegraph & Telephone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API