Commonwealth v. Churchill
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This is an indictment against George Churchill and Nathaniel H. Whittemore, for keeping and maintaining a tenement used for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquors. The defendant Churchill owned the premises, and had made a written lease of them to one Dow. The defendant Whittemore was Dow’s servant and agent employed there in his business.
With regard to Churchill, the jury were instructed that, if he made the lease knowing that Dow intended to use the premises for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquors, and Dow did so use them during the time alleged, he might be found guilty under this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. ErwinNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Commonwealth v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Commonwealth v. TryonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Commonwealth v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Commonwealth v. BossidyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Graves v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- People v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Commonwealth v. GalliganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Commonwealth v. Western Union Tel. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.