Nevills v. Moore Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. E. L. Campbell, John F. Davis, and F. J. Solinsky, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
In January, 1885, appellant, William A. Nevills, and defendants John P. Jones, John Flemming, and D. C. Nichols, were owners of all the capital stock of a corporation called the Amador Tunnel, Mill, and Mining Company, whose property was situated in Amador County. Nevills was appointed superintendent of the company at a salary of $250 per month, and immediately began work on the mine. About three months later, in April or May, 1885, these same parties formed a mining copartnership for the purpose of working the so-called Moore mining property, which they purchased in 1884, and on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Gould v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Osment v. McelrathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Cauhape v. Security Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by24 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Cooper v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.