Legal Opinion
Matter of Blilie
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 17, 1992No. C6-91-2444Published
1Opinion of the Court
484 N.W.2d 34 (1992)
In the Matter of Lorraine BLILIE.
No. C6-91-2444.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 14, 1992.
Review Granted June 17, 1992.
Peter M. Rosene, Rosene & Haugrud, Chartered, St. Paul, for appellant Blilie.
Tom Foley, Ramsey County Atty., Richard H. Hoffman, Asst. County Atty., Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., David P. Iverson, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.
Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and HUSPENI and SHORT, JJ.
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Lorraine Blilie appeals from the trial court's denial of her petition for a declaratory judgment, an injunction, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Price v. SheppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Jarvis v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Matter of HarhutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.