Legal Opinion
Dahlman Farms, Inc. v. FMC Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 2, 2002No. CIV.01-986 JEL/JGLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LANCASTER, District Judge.
This action arises from Dahlman Farms, Inc.’s (Dahlman) use of AIM herbicide (AIM) on its seed corn crop in 1999, which allegedly caused severe damage to the crop and resulted in a loss of yield. Dahl-man sued the manufacturer of AIM, FMC Corporation (FMC), asserting several claims under Minnesota state law. The matter comes before the Court on FMC’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons given below, the Court grants FMC’s motion.
I. SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a)(1), 1441(a) (2000).
II.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dj Coleman, Inc. v. Nufarm Americas, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2010
- Mortellite v. Novartis Crop Protection, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Anderson v. Dow Agrosciences LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2003
- Akee v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2003
- Akee v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2003