Legal Opinion

Akee v. Dow Chemical Co.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided July 21, 2003No. 00-CV-382BMKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING SHELL’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART¡ DOW’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING DOLE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT TV

KURREN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court, pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is Shell Oil Company’s, Shell Petroleum Inc.’s, Shell Chemical Company’s, and Shell Chemicals, Ltd.’s (“Shell” or the “Shell Defendants”) and The Dow Chemical Company’s (“Dow”) Motions for Summary Judgment on the remaining claims of Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint. In addition,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Billy Joe Shaw v. Dow Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Richard Leander Ferebee, Jr. v. Chevron Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Akee v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API