Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Boyle

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 2015No. 2012AP2322-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the report of the referee, Attorney Michael F. Dubis, recommending that Attorney Charles A. Boyle's license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for a period of 90 days and that he be required to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $15,453.40 as of February 4, 2014. Because no appeal has been filed, we proceed with our review of the referee's report and recommendation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.17(2).1

¶ 2. The standard we employ to review a referee's report and recommendation in an attorney disci*548plinary case is well-established. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. GroganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CoplienWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Charles A. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. RoitburdWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Stuart F. RoitburdWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Stuart F. RoitburdWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Stuart F. RoitburdWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API