Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Charles A. Boyle

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2016No. 2015AP002100-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Charles A. Boyle have filed a stipulation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12 that Attorney Boyle's license to practice law in this state should be suspended for a period of 60 days, as discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Illinois. After reviewing this matter, we approve the stipulation and impose the stipulated reciprocal discipline. The OLR does not seek costs, and we do not impose any.

¶ 2. Attorney Boyle was admitted to the practice of law in Illinois in November 1966. He was also admitted to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API