Cincinnati Insurance v. Mullinax
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Judge.
The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati) appeals the trial court’s grant of defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the denial of its own motion for summary judgment. In the underlying declaratory judgment action, Cincinnati sought a determination of the rights and obligations conferred in the automobile insurance contract issued by Cincinnati to defendants Randy J. Mullinax and Shawn A. Mullinax.
Randy and Shawn Mullinax are listed as the named insureds on the automobile insurance contract issued by Cincinnati. While using their car, without their permission, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Washington v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Caldwell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Sargent v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Kelly v. Lloyd's of LondonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hurst v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Andrews v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Anderson v. MullinaxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Anderson v. MullinaxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998