Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Mullinax

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1998No. S97G1573PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

The issue in this granted certiorari is whether an uninsured motorist (UM) carrier may set off medical payments made by the tortfeasor’s insurance carrier. Because the policy at issue in this case contains no provision for such a set-off, we hold that set-off is not permissible and reverse.

Jamie Anderson was injured while a passenger in a car driven by Meagan Mullinax. Cincinnati Insurance Company, which provided automobile liability insurance to Meagan’s parents, paid Jamie’s medical expenses under the medical payments coverage, but denied all other liability for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. HSI Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Alley v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Park 'N Go of Georgia, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Cincinnati Insurance v. MullinaxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rouse v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Dees v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Erturk v. Geico General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Anderson v. MullinaxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API