Legal Opinion

International Union of Operating Engineers Local 139 v. Schimel

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 12, 2017No. 16-3736 & 16-3834PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

The International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 139 and Local 420 (“IUOE”), challenged Wisconsin’s right-to-work law. The district court determined that this Court’s decision upholding Indiana’s nearly-identical law, Sweeney v. Pence, 767 F.3d 654 (7th Cir. 2014), controlled in this case, and the court dismissed IUOE’s complaint with prejudice. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. Background

A. The Sweeney Decision

In 2012, Indiana passed a right-to-work law that prohibits agreements requiring people to:(1) become or remain a member of a labor organization; [or](2)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Doe v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Transohio Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  5. Muscarello v. Ogle County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. BevinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Laborers' Pension Fund v. MiscevicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Int'l Ass'n of Machinists Dist. Ten & Local Lodge 873 v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Shawn Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
  5. Anka v. Miscevic v. Estate of M.M.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API