Legal Opinion

Copeland v. City of Waldport

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The city of Waldport in Lincoln county .was organized as a municipal corporation in the year 1911 .under the general laws of the state of Oregon, and adopted as its charter the charter provided by the general laws, Oregon Code 1930, § 56-401 et seq.:

“The mayor and aldermen shall compose the common council of any such city or town organized under this act, and at any regular meeting thereof shall have power to provide for lighting the streets, and furnishing such city or town and inhabitants thereof with gas or other lights, and with pure and wholesome water; and for such purpose may construct…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. New Orleans Water-Works Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rose City Transit Co. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. City of Eugene v. Comcast of Oregon II, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. A. E. Mountain v. Pinellas CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. In Re Rockaway Water DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. City of Eugene v. Comcast of Oregon II, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API