Legal Opinion
In re Xcel Energy, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 12, 2004No. CIV. 02-2677(DSD/FLN). MDL No. 1511PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the motions of defendants Wayne H. Brunetti, Douglas W. Leatherdale, C. Coney Burgess, A. Barry Hirschfield, Margaret R. Preska, Allan L. Schuman, W. Thomas Stephens, Giannantonio Ferrari, Albert F. Moreno, A. Patricia Sampson, Rodney E. Slifer, James J. Howard, David A. Christensen, Roger R. Hemminghaus, Edward J. McIntyre, David E. Ripka and Xcel Energy, Inc. (“Xcel”), to dismiss plaintiff Edith Gottlieb’s amended shareholder derivative complaint.1 For the reasons stated, defendants’ motions are granted.
BACKGROUND
The factual…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Kramer v. Western Pacific Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Ferro Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Shoen v. SAC Holding Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Xcel Energy, Inc., Securities, Derivative & "ERISA" LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- In Re Patterson Companies, Inc. SecuritiesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.