Shoen v. SAC Holding Corp.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Hardesty, J.:
In resolving this appeal, we clarify when the demand for corrective action that a shareholder must make upon a company’s board of directors before filing a derivative suit may be excused as futile. Appellants Paul Shoen, Ron Belec, Glenbrook Capital, L.P., and Alan Kahn are shareholders in AMERCO, a Nevada holding company whose main subsidiary is U-Haul International, Inc. In 2002 and 2003, appellants filed four separate derivative suits, on behalf of nominal respondent AMERCO, against respondents who are (1) then-current and former AMERCO directors; (2)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. WynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. DoddsNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Lawrence Arduini v. IgtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Pack v. LATOURETTENevada Supreme Court · 2012
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.