Legal Opinion

Shoen v. SAC Holding Corp.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2006No. 41563PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

In resolving this appeal, we clarify when the demand for corrective action that a shareholder must make upon a company’s board of directors before filing a derivative suit may be excused as futile. Appellants Paul Shoen, Ron Belec, Glenbrook Capital, L.P., and Alan Kahn are shareholders in AMERCO, a Nevada holding company whose main subsidiary is U-Haul International, Inc. In 2002 and 2003, appellants filed four separate derivative suits, on behalf of nominal respondent AMERCO, against respondents who are (1) then-current and former AMERCO directors; (2)…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  4. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. WynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. DoddsNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lawrence Arduini v. IgtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Pack v. LATOURETTENevada Supreme Court · 2012

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API