Legal Opinion
Jou v. Chang
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 10, 2004No. CV 04-00718DAEBMKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
DAVID ALAN EZRA, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d), the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing. After reviewing Plaintiffs motion and the supporting and opposing memoranda, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, DENIES Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and DISMISSES Plaintiffs complaint without…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Molina v. Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
- Petramala v. Arizona, State ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020