Legal Opinion
Petramala v. Arizona, State of
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 10, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00029Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Michael Petramala, No. CV-19-00029-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 State of Arizona, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 INTRODUCTION 15 In 2004, a judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court issued an order concluding 16 that Plaintiff Michael Petramala was incompetent to stand trial. Although this finding 17 resulted in the dismissal of the criminal charges that were pending against Petramala at the 18 time, it also resulted in the placement of Petramala’s name in the National Instant Criminal 19 Background…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sprint Commc'ns, Inc. v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.