Legal Opinion

Celina Mutual Insurance v. Falls

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1976No. Docket 22249PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Maher, P. J.

Plaintiff insurance company brought this action seeking a declaration that defendants were not its insureds on March 6, 1974, when defendants were allegedly injured in a collision with an uninsured motor vehicle. Not having prevailed below, plaintiff appeals.

On December 19, 1973, defendant Falls applied for a family automobile policy through plaintiff insurance company. Shortly thereafter, plaintiff issued the policy providing liability coverage, personal protection coverage (no fault), third party property protection coverage (no fault), property damage coverage and uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gooden v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Good v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Phillips v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Davis v. Cadillac Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. LemasterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Dorsey v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. American States Insurance v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Ophus v. Tri-State Insurance Co. of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. CrenshawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API