Legal Opinion

United States v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 29, 1996No. 95-4193PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Raymond Coe appeals his sentence of 267 months for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Coe argues that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility under USSG § 3E1.1 (1994). In reviewing a trial court’s refusal to grant an adjustment, this court reviews interpretations of the sentencing guidelines de novo, United States v. Pedersen, 3 F.3d 1468, 1470 (11th Cir.1993), and factual determinations for clear error, United States v. Kendrick, 22 F.3d 1066, 1068 (11th Cir.1994).

Section 3E1.1 requires a downward adjustment “[i]f the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. William Lawrence PedersenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Frank Kendrick, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Adrian Pielago, Maria VaronaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Enrique Martinez MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Roosevelt Coats, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Stephayne McClure-PottsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Derrick Dante ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API