Legal Opinion
United States v. Enrique Martinez Mathews
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 30, 2017No. 16-11191PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Enrique Martinez Mathews (“Martinez”) appeals his total 60-month sentence. After careful review of the briefs and the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s increases to Martinez’s offense level for (1) alteration and falsification of an “especially probative record” under U.S.S.G. § 2J1.2(b)(3)(B), and (2) knowing that the victim of the offense was vulnerable under § 3Al.l(b)(l). However, the district court erroneously concluded that it lacked any legal authority to grant an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction under §…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Jason M. MoriartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Samuel ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Michael Pedro AndresCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Roosevelt Coats, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Hannibal MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Alexander LeszczynskiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Charles Raymond StagnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.