United States v. William Lawrence Pedersen
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MELTON, Senior District Judge:
William Lawrence Pedersen (Pedersen) appeals his sentence, challenging the district court’s application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. 1 Pedersen asserts that the court erred in enhancing his base offense level for insider trading, U.S.S.G. § 2F1.2, by two levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3, upon finding that he abused a position of special trust. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Pedersen’s sentence.
I. BACKGROUND
Pedersen was a police detective employed by the City of Chicago Police Department. He also operated a business called Professional…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Willie Frank GoolsbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. David BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. William Franklin MilliganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Stephen John JordiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Albert JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.