Legal Opinion

Amacher v. Brown-Forman Corp.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 25, 1991PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

Plaintiffs, fourteen Moore County farmers, sued the makers of Jack Daniels whiskey claiming an enforceable right to purchase a distillery by-product. The chancellor granted the distillery summary judgment. The question raised in this appeal is whether the record contains material facts showing the plaintiffs have a cause of action for promissory estoppel.

I

In making sour mash whiskey, a distiller produces a by-product known as stillage, a wet, thick mixture of grain and other products. Stillage, sometimes referred to in the record as “slop”, is a valuable source of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perlin v. BD. OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Rossow Oil Co. v. HeimanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Reuben v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. William D. (Bill) Clark and Margaret ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. West Farms Estate Co. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Siddarth Shah and Daksha Shah, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Racetrac Petroleum Co., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Barnes & Robinson Co. v. OneSource Facility Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. Doe v. University of the SouthDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
  4. Chavez v. Broadway Electric Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  5. Cadence Bank, NA v. The Alpha TrustCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API