Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Holland
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, District Judge.
This case presents a challenge to defendant’s city-wide prohibition against new off-site billboards. Plaintiffs complaint alleges violations of the Michigan Home Rule City Act (“HRCA”), M.C.L. 117.1 et seq., and the relevant provision of the Zoning Enabling Act (“ZEA”), M.C.L. 125.581 et seq. The complaint also states a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a violation of plaintiffs rights under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Now before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
I
The ordinance under challenge in this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Employees of Department of Public Health v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc v. City of HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- North American Natural Resources, Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Comm'nDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998