Legal Opinion
North American Natural Resources, Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Comm'n
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 24, 1998No. 1:98-cr-00021PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases own and operate electric cogeneration facilities which are “qualifying facilities” (“QF”) under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 824-824k. 1 Plaintiffs filed their complaints against Defendants seeking a declaration that certain orders issued by the Michigan Public Service Commission (“MPSC”) are in conflict with and violate PURPA. Plaintiffs in case nos. 5:98-CV-21 and 5:98-CV-22 also seek declaratory relief based upon Defendants’ alleged violation of Plaintiffs’ due process…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- North American Natural Resources, Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Comm'nDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999
- S.C. Elec. & Gas Co. v. WhitfieldDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
- North American Natural Resources, Inc. Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership Michigan Power Limited Partnership Central Wayne Energy Recovery Limited Partnership v. John G. Strand, Chairman, John C. Shea and David A. Svanda, Commissioners of the Michigan Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001