Legal Opinion
Tuley v. McClung
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 8 opinions
From the Monroe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.
Samuel A. McClung, as the assignee of S. A. McClung & Co., sued Charles P. Tuley, in the court below, upon two promissory notes executed by the said Tuley and another person, under the firm name of C. P. Tuley & Co., and dated October 15th, 1876. Each note contained and concluded with the stipulation, “ agree to pay attorney’s fees for collecting the same.”
The court tried the cause and found that there was due the plaintiff the sum of two hundred and one dollars and fifty cents for principal and interest on the notes, and the further sum of twenty dollars for attorney’s fees.
Over a motion for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Churchman v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Smock v. RipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Brown v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Garver v. PontiousIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by8 opinions
- Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Sutton Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- Baker Gin Co. v. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bond v. OrndorfIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Lauferty v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. BartonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.