Legal Opinion

Garver v. Pontious

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Erom the Hamilton. Circuit Court. .

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by the appellees, as payees, against the appellant, as the maker, of a promissory note, of which the following is a copy :

“$60.19. ISToblesville, Ind., Jan. 29th, 1877.
“ One day after date, we jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Pontious & 'Wainwright, at Citizens Bank, Hoblesville, Ind., sixty 19-100 dollars, with ten per cent, interest from date, if not paid when due, and reasonable attorney’s fees ; value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws. The drawers and endorsers severally waive presentment for payment, protest and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Churchman v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Smock v. RipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Brown v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Tuley v. McClungIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Bond v. OrndorfIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Merchants' Nat. Bank v. SevierUnited States Circuit Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API