Thomas J. Mulgrew Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dubuque District Gou/rt. — Robert Bonson, Judge. Action to recover on a cyclone, tornado, and high wind policy. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the court below. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
On the 15th day of July, 1914, the defendant insured a certain frame building, occupied as an icehouse, against loss or damage sustained by the assured, occasioned by tornadoes, cyclones, and windstorms. On the night of January 16, 1915, between the hours of 7 and 8 o’clock, this building was blown down and destroyed by wind, and plaintiff brings this action to recover under the policy. The only question presented here by the defendant on this appeal, as indicated by its brief points, is the insufficiency of the evidence to. justify the jury in finding that the injury to this building was due…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Druggist Mut. Ins. Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- George A. Hoagland & Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Sabatier Bros. v. Scottish Union & National Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934