Legal Opinion

George A. Hoagland & Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1936No. 29676PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant on an insurance policy to recover for loss and damage by windstorm to a. lumbershed and lumber stored therein. Plaintiff had. judgment, and defendant has appealed.

It is conceded that the policy was issued by defendant, was in force, and covered the shed and lumber stored therein. Defendant denied that any loss or damage occurred by reason of windstorm. It is defendant’s contention that the building was old, decayed, and collapsed-by reason of age and decay, and not because of any windstorm. One element of recovery was for assorting, repiling and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Iowa Mutual Tornado InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Scottish Union & National Insurance v. B. E. Linkenhelt & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Thomas J. Mulgrew Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. v. SciandraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Curtis O. Griess & Sons, Inc. v. Farm Bureau InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Long v. Crystal Refrigerator Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Pearson v. Aroostook County Patrons Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  5. Sherman v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API