Legal Opinion

Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Ballantyne

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1929No. Nos. 5327, 5328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

— For many years prior to October 11, 1926, two highway districts lay adjoining each other in Jefferson county: Fremont County Highway District No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as Fremont District), and Camas-Monteview Highway District (hereinafter referred to as Camas-Monteview District). On that day, certain qualified residents of a part of the Fremont District adjoining the Camas-Monteview District petitioned the board of county commissioners for the organization of a new highway district, to be carved out of the Fremont District and to be known as Mud Lake Highway District. The county…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Willard v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Pillsbury v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1890
  3. Bell v. StadlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Merrill v. Fremont Abstract Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Hindman v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newby v. City of St. AnthonyIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Continental Development Corporation, Inc. v. VinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API