Legal Opinion · Dissent

Continental Development Corporation, Inc. v. Vines

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 30, 1972No. SC 50Published

1DissentHeflin, Chief Justice

The Continental Development Corporation, herein referred to as CDC, failed to prove its reasons for its failure to pay into court or to tender to the appellees the amount necessary to redeem as averred in the bill of complaint (usurious interest and fraud). However, CDC did present testimony concerning other reasons for such failure. It introduced as an exhibit a put-ported written itemized statement of the debt and lawful charges claimed by the appellees. This statement was delivered to CDC by the appellees pursuant to a written demand of CDC in accordance with Title 7, Section 731, Code.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wolf Corporation v. LouisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. Roth v. Drainage Improvement District No. 5Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Bemer v. BemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Garrison v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Harbison v. ShookIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API