Hanold v. Watson's Orchard Property Owners Ass'n

JUSTICE HEARN:

In this action to enforce restrictive covenants, we affirm the court of appeals in finding Petitioners’ property was not developed into discrete lots to entitle them to voting rights under the covenants. We write now only to clarify that portion of the court of appeals’ opinion that may be read to conflate the terms “developed” and “improved.”

DISCUSSION

The facts of this case are not in dispute and can be found in the court of appeals opinion, Hanold v. Watson’s Orchard *164Property Owners Ass’n, Inc., 412 S.C. 387, 772 S.E.2d 528 (Ct. App. 2015).

We agree with the court of appeals’…