Sleasman v. City of Lacey
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
151 P.3d 990 (2007)
Stephen SLEASMAN and Barbara Sleasman, husband and wife, Petitioners,
v.
CITY OF LACEY, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent.
No. 77590-7.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued September 12, 2006.
Decided February 8, 2007.
Michael G. Gusa, Kalikow & Gusa PLLC, Olympia, WA, for Petitioners.
Joseph Michael Svoboda, Attorney at Law, Lacey, WA, William Dale Kamerrer, Law Lyman Daniel Kamerrer et al, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.
SANDERS, J.
¶ 1 We are asked to determine the meaning of "undeveloped" and "partially developed" lot as these terms were used in a Lacey…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Udall v. TD Escrow Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- ABBEY ROAD GROUP v. City of Bonney LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Griffin v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Griffin v. Thurston County Board of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Ellensburg Cement Products, Inc. v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.