Legal Opinion

Sleasman v. City of Lacey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2007No. 77590-7PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

151 P.3d 990 (2007)

Stephen SLEASMAN and Barbara Sleasman, husband and wife, Petitioners,

v.

CITY OF LACEY, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent.

No. 77590-7.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued September 12, 2006.

Decided February 8, 2007.

Michael G. Gusa, Kalikow & Gusa PLLC, Olympia, WA, for Petitioners.

Joseph Michael Svoboda, Attorney at Law, Lacey, WA, William Dale Kamerrer, Law Lyman Daniel Kamerrer et al, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.

SANDERS, J.

¶ 1 We are asked to determine the meaning of "undeveloped" and "partially developed" lot as these terms were used in a Lacey…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Udall v. TD Escrow Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. ABBEY ROAD GROUP v. City of Bonney LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Griffin v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Griffin v. Thurston County Board of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ellensburg Cement Products, Inc. v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API