Legal Opinion
Hanold v. Watson's Orchard Property Owners Ass'n
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided April 15, 2015No. Appellate Case No. 2013-000452; Nos. 5312, 2013-000452PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Pelham Farm, LLC; Legacy One, LLC; an unknown trustee of the revocable trust agreement established by James B. Stephens; and Jay Stephens and Mike Stephens, as co-personal representatives of the estate of James B. Stephens (collectively Appellants 1) contend the circuit court erred in *392finding their amendment to a restrictive covenant that governed the development of property in Greenville County, South Carolina, was invalid for lack of a majority vote. We affirm.
FACTS
In the 1960s, Richard Watson and his wife began developing their substantial landholdings that stretched from present-day 1-385…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strother v. Lexington County Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Mathis v. Brown & Brown of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Sleasman v. City of LaceyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Kenai Peninsula Borough v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hanold v. Watson's Orchard Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Hanold v. Watson's Orchard Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Kenneth S. Hoffman v. Saad Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026