American Employers' Ins. v. Lee & Kincaid Coal Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The original party plaintiff was the “United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, for the use of Lee & Kincaid Coal Company, a corporation.” The Lee & Kincaid Company, being the beneficiary, was the real party, plaintiff, and not the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, although it was. an obligee in the bond. The amendment, eliminating the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as a party plaintiff, did riot operate as an entire change of parties plaintiff, and was properly allowed by the trial court. Smith v. Yearwood, 197 Ala. 680, 682; 73 So. 384, and the statute…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liability Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yeilding Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Smith v. YearwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- La Salle Iron Works, Inc. v. LargenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Adams Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Sparks Construction, Inc. v. Newman Brothers, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- State Bd. of Optometry v. Lee Optical Co. of Al, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Alexander Thomson, Inc. v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.