Legal Opinion

American Employers' Ins. v. Lee & Kincaid Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 19, 1933No. 6 Div. 7PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The original party plaintiff was the “United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, for the use of Lee & Kincaid Coal Company, a corporation.” The Lee & Kincaid Company, being the beneficiary, was the real party, plaintiff, and not the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, although it was. an obligee in the bond. The amendment, eliminating the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as a party plaintiff, did riot operate as an entire change of parties plaintiff, and was properly allowed by the trial court. Smith v. Yearwood, 197 Ala. 680, 682; 73 So. 384, and the statute…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liability Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yeilding Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Smith v. YearwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. La Salle Iron Works, Inc. v. LargenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. Adams Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Sparks Construction, Inc. v. Newman Brothers, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  4. State Bd. of Optometry v. Lee Optical Co. of Al, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. Alexander Thomson, Inc. v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API