Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance v. Turner Construction Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 29, 2011No. 07 Civ. 11095(JFK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

JOHN F. KEENAN, District Judge:

Before the Court is Plaintiff Federal Insurance Company’s (“Federal” or “Plaintiff’) motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Intervenor-Defendant New York City Economic Development Corporation’s (“EDC”) cross motion for summary judgment and leave to amend its Answer to include a direct cause of action against Federal. For the reasons that follow, Federal’s motion for summary judgment is granted. EDC’s motion to amend is denied as moot.

I. Background

A. The Contract

The following facts are…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Beyer v. County of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nielsen Co. v. Success Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. 656 Hermitage Circle, LLC v. WallachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API