Vaughn v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOpinion by Salmon, J.
The Maryland Court of Appeals, in Skok v. State, 361 Md. 52, 760 A.2d 647 (2000), made a significant change in the Maryland common law in regards to the circumstances under which a convict could overturn his or her conviction by filing a writ of error coram nobis. Id. at 70, 77, 760 A.2d 647. Relying on the reasoning set forth in United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 74 S.Ct. 247, 98 L.Ed. 248 (1954) (announcing law to be applied in federal courts), the Skok Court held that a change in the common law governing coram nobis relief was justified due to “contemporary conditions and public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. DenedoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Skok v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bodeau v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020