Legal Opinion

Strange v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public Transportation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1992No. 23570PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

Appellant South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation contends the trial judge committed a variety of errors when he presided over the trial of this personal injury lawsuit. We agree with several of appellant’s assertions, and, accordingly, reverse and remand for a new trial.

I. FACTS

Respondents Tammi Strange and Jonnie Faye Hudson drove to a tavern one rainy night in order to use a telephone *163there. They traveled along an unpainted, ungraded secondary road covered with dark, new asphalt. On the way back home, respondents’ automobile ran off the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Foster v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. Broom Ex Rel. Broom v. Southeastern Highway Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Strange v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Hoeffner Ex Rel. Estate of Hoeffner v. CitadelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Brady Development Co. v. Town of Hilton Head IslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Cunningham v. Helping Hands, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. McDill v. Mark's Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API