Strange v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public Transportation
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Chief Justice:
Appellant South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation contends the trial judge committed a variety of errors when he presided over the trial of this personal injury lawsuit. We agree with several of appellant’s assertions, and, accordingly, reverse and remand for a new trial.
I. FACTS
Respondents Tammi Strange and Jonnie Faye Hudson drove to a tavern one rainy night in order to use a telephone *163there. They traveled along an unpainted, ungraded secondary road covered with dark, new asphalt. On the way back home, respondents’ automobile ran off the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Foster v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Broom Ex Rel. Broom v. Southeastern Highway Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Strange v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Hoeffner Ex Rel. Estate of Hoeffner v. CitadelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Brady Development Co. v. Town of Hilton Head IslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Cunningham v. Helping Hands, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- McDill v. Mark's Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.