Legal Opinion

Christophersen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1917No. Docket No. 42PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Assumpsit by Kittie Christophersen against the Metropolitan Life. Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

{dissenting). From a judgment upon a directed verdict for the plaintiff this case is brought here by writ of error. This suit is brought by Kittie Christophersen, beneficiary named in the insurance policy issued by defendant to Alda C. Christophersen, her sister. Alda Christophersen was a domestic in *635an apartment house in Chicago. In January, 1916, she came to Muskegon on a visit. While there upon January 29, 1916, she made application for a policy of insurance. She returned to Chicago February 13th, in apparent good health. February 22dj or early the next morning, she was taken sick. On the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Provident Life Insurance v. FennellIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Russell v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Illinois Central Insurance v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  5. McConnell v. BraynerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lyon v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Wells v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API