Warford v. Beard
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
COUNTISS, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying a Rule 215a 1 motion to require two deponents to answer certain questions and produce certain documents. The trial court concluded the deponents were entitled to rely on their privilege against self-incrimination in refusing to answer the questions or produce the documents. We reverse and remand.
The case before us is part of the continuing controversy outlined in Warford v. Childers, 642 S.W.2d 63 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1982, no writ). Appellants J. Albert Warford and JoAnne Stevens are plaintiffs in a civil suit against various persons in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re SpeerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Burton v. West, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Sinclair v. Savings & Loan Commissioner of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- Sutherland v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986
- Sinclair v. Savings & Loan Commissioner of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.