Testera v. Richardson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered February 8, 1913, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
The respondent B. Richardson was proceeding by notice and sale to foreclose a chattel mortgage to satisfy a note executed by the appellants.
The appellants thereupon transferred the proceedings to the superior court for the purpose of contesting the amount claimed to be due upon the note on the ground of usury. The trial court concluded that the note was not usurious, and entered a decree of foreclosure. This appeal is prosecuted from that decree.
The appellants maintain that the note was usurious. This is the only question presented. It appears that the appellants in October, 1910, borrowed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ridgway v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by8 opinions
- Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Aetna Finance Co. v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Washington Fire Insurance v. Maple Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Jorgenson v. StirlingIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Sparkman & McLean Income Fund v. WaldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.