Legal Opinion

Thacker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1936No. 18449PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KREUGER, Judge.

— The appellant was convicted of the offense of murder with malice aforethought, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of twenty years.

Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. If the facts and circumstances proven are sufficient to show appellant to be a principal, the conviction should be affirmed. If not, then the case should be reversed. Art. 69, P. C., 1925, provides: “Any person who advises or agrees to the commission of an offense and who is present when the same is committed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Musgrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Musgrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API