Thacker v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KREUGER, Judge.
— The appellant was convicted of the offense of murder with malice aforethought, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of twenty years.
Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. If the facts and circumstances proven are sufficient to show appellant to be a principal, the conviction should be affirmed. If not, then the case should be reversed. Art. 69, P. C., 1925, provides: “Any person who advises or agrees to the commission of an offense and who is present when the same is committed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Musgrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Musgrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953