Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campbell v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1990No. 34A048906CR235Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

I

I agree that in considering aggravating circumstances, the court is not restricted to those specific factors set forth in I.C. 85-*117038-1-7(b). Ballard v. State (1988) Ind., 531 N.E.2d 196. I do not agree, however, that here the factors recited by the court as aggravating cireumstances, or any one of them, permits imposition of consecutive sentences.

The majority opinion appropriately observes that the trial court erred in holding the secret nature of the crime to be an aggravating circumstance. Such secrecy, as noted, "is a common element in all similar crimes." P. 1169. Similarly, in my…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fointno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kendrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. Missouri Valley Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Wright Contracting Company, United States of America v. Mid-Atlantic Paving Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. Cunningham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API