Cunningham v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Judge.
Appellants-Defendants Alberteen Cunningham (Alberteen) and Iotha Cunning ham (Iotha) appeal their Hamilton Superior Court jury convictions on various charges of theft, a class D felony, IND.CODE 35-48-4-2, perjury, and class D felony, IND. CODE 35-44-2-1, and conversion, a class A misdemeanor, IND.CODE 35-48-4-8. Io-tha also appeals the sentence rendered by the trial court.
We affirm.
ISSUES
This appeal presents five issues:
1. Whether the trial court erred in refusing to sever Alberteen's trial.
2. Whether the trial court erred in refusing to declare a mistrial due to alleged…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Maldonado v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Norris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fointno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Kollar v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Catt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.